Product Security Hub Logo
Why Product Security Hub

The Problem Isn't Tools. It's Continuity.

Most product security teams don't struggle because they lack threat models, SBOMs, or vulnerability scanners. They struggle because these artifacts live in different places, evolve independently, and lose meaning over time.

Threat models are created.
SBOMs are generated.
Vulnerabilities are tracked.
Compliance evidence is assembled.

But none of it stays connected.

As products change, security context drifts. Teams are forced to rebuild understanding during audits, submissions, and incidents.

This is where product security breaks down.

For regulated products, this gap is not theoretical.

It shows up as delayed submissions, audit findings, reactive risk assessments, and slow post-market response. Teams are forced to rediscover security context under pressure — when it matters most.

Why Existing Tools Will Always Fall Short

Threat Modeling Tools

Design-time decisions

Optimized for creating threat models at design phase, not for continuous lifecycle management.

SCA Tools

Component discovery

Built for scanning components, not for connecting threats to vulnerabilities and context.

Spreadsheets

Manual documentation

Static and brittle—prone to errors, version control issues, and disconnection from workflow.

Ticketing Systems

Workflow management

Designed for task tracking, not for maintaining traceability or security context.

Each tool optimizes for a single moment in the product lifecycle.

But product security is not a moment.

It is a continuous system that must persist across development, release, and post-market.

When architecture changes, threats drift
When components update, SBOMs change
When vulnerabilities emerge, context disappears

No existing tool is designed to preserve these relationships over time.

What Product Security Actually Requires

Modern product security teams need more than artifacts. They need a living system that connects:

1

Architecture to threats

Know your system before identifying risks

2

Threats to requirements

Turn threats into security requirements

3

Requirements to components

Map requirements to the SBOM

4

Components to vulnerabilities

Assess vulnerabilities against your requirements

5

Vulnerabilities to compliance evidence

Create traceability for audits

When these relationships stay intact, teams stop rebuilding security from scratch.

They start operating it.

Product Security Hub Is Not Another Tool

Product Security Hub is the operational layer for product security.

Over time, Product Security Hub builds a persistent security graph across architecture, threats, components, vulnerabilities, and evidence — something point tools cannot reconstruct after the fact.

It does not replace your QMS, scanners, or engineering workflows.

It connects them into a continuously updated workspace.

Instead of generating snapshots

Product Security Hub preserves continuity.

Instead of documenting security

It operationalizes it.

This is what it means for product security to have a place to live.

How Product Security Hub Changes the Model

With Product Security Hub:

  • Security artifacts remain connected as products evolve.
  • Risk is evaluated in context, not isolation.
  • Compliance evidence is always current, not reconstructed.
  • Post-market vulnerabilities are understood immediately, not rediscovered.

Product security becomes a living system, not a periodic exercise.

The Shift

Most organizations still treat product security as something they produce.

Product Security Hub treats it as something they operate.

That is the difference between:

  • documentation resilience
  • snapshots continuity
  • tools infrastructure

This is why Product Security Hub exists.

Most product security tools generate snapshots.

Product Security Hub preserves continuity.

Comparison: Old Models vs a Living System

Capability Product Security Hub Spreadsheets Threat Modeling Tools SCA Tools
Centralized Product Security Workspace
Native, continuous
Manual, static Limited to design-time Not designed for lifecycle management
Lifecycle Traceability
End-to-end and persistent
Static and brittle Partial and isolated Fragmented across components
Post-Market Continuity
Built-in and contextual
Manual reconstruction Not supported Component-focused only
Operational Risk Visibility
Real-time and contextual
After-the-fact Design-time only Vulnerability-only
Compliance Readiness
Continuous
Manual and episodic Artifact-based Input-only

See how Product Security Hub brings continuity to your program.

Whether you start from architecture, R&D, or Quality—Product Security Hub gives your team one place to model, execute, and prove security work continuously.